Excluding Psychiatric & Psychological Testimony/Experts with Motions in limine & Daubert Motions

Motions in limine or Daubert motions are highly effective but underutilized vehicles to challenge and exclude prejudicial, unreliable and unscientific psychiatric and psychological testimony and steer away from the uncertainties of the prevalent dueling experts model.  A great deal of what is proffered as reliable forensic evidence from the practitioners in these specialties is done […]

read more

Gatekeeping Information on 948 new expert witnesses

1 Aaron  Woolfson Telecommunications Order a Complete profile for this expert witness 2 Aaron J. Jones P.E. Materials/Met. Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Fire Investigation Order a Complete profile for this expert witness 3 Abraham  Kelly Chemistry , Env. Science/Tech. Order a Complete profile for this expert witness 4 Adm. David P. Sargent Jr. Admiralty/Maritime;Adm./Maritime Order a […]

read more

Find Credibility Determining Information on 694 new experts

You can now find credibility determining information on the following 694 experts and many more. To find more information on any expert witness of your choice, visit: http://expertwitnessguru.com/services/expert-witness-profile/ Name of Expert Discipline 1 Christopher  Kauderer B.S.M.E., A.C.T.A.R. Accident Recon./Invest. Click to Order Expert Witness Profile 2 Richard C. Hodson Accident Recon./Invest. Click to Order Expert Witness […]

read more

Debunking Psychological and Psychiatric Expert Testimony

It is of central importance that litigators understand and deal effectively with expert testimony in cases that contain claims for emotional distress.  Attorneys have long struggled to cope with the arcane testimony of psychiatric and psychological experts with varying degrees of success.  The problem has stemmed from inadequate standards of evidence and the fact that […]

read more